A novel, clinically relevant use of a piglet model to study the effects of anesthetics on the developing brain
© Whitaker et al. 2016
Received: 1 September 2015
Accepted: 29 November 2015
Published: 12 January 2016
Anesthesia-induced neurotoxicity research in the developing brain must rely upon an unimpeachable animal model and a standardized treatment approach. In this manner, identification of mechanisms of action may be undertaken. The goal of this study was to develop a novel, clinically relevant, translational way to use a piglet model to investigate anesthesia effects on the developing brain.
29 newborn piglets were assigned to either: (1) control (no intervention, n = 10); (2) lipopolysaccharide (LPS; positive inflammatory control, n = 9); or (3) isoflurane anesthesia (n = 10). Positive inflammatory control animals were given 100 mcg/kg LPS from Escherichia coli intraperitoneally (IP) on the same day as those receiving isoflurane. Isoflurane was administered for 3 h while care was taken to ensure human perioperative conditions. To establish a clinical scenario, each animal was intubated and monitored with pulse oximetry, invasive and non-invasive blood pressure, electrocardiogram, temperature, end-tidal CO2, anesthetic concentration, and iSTAT blood analysis. All animals were sacrificed after 48 h using transcardiac perfusion of ice-cold, heparinized phosphate buffered saline (PBS) followed by 4 % paraformaldehyde (PFA). Brains were collected and histopathological analysis focused on the entorhinal cortex looking for degenerative changes due to its critical role in learning and memory. Reliable identification of entorhinal cortex was achieved by using colored ink on the surface of the brains, which was then cross-referenced with microscopic anatomy. Hematoxylin & eosin-stained high-power fields was used to quantify cells. ImageJ™ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used to count absolute number of progenitor glial cells (PGC) and number of PGCs per cluster. Immunohistochemistry was also utilized to ensure positive identification of cellular structures.
Histopathological sections of 28 brains were analyzed. One animal in the LPS group died shortly after administration, presumably from inadvertent intravascular injection. There was an acute basal ganglia ischemic infarct in one isoflurane-treated animal. A large number of small, round nucleated cells were seen throughout layer II of the entorhinal cortex in all animals. These cells were identified as PGCs using immunohistochemistry and light microscopy. Although there was no difference in the absolute number of PGCs between the groups, animals given isoflurane or LPS demonstrated a significant increase in cells forming ‘clusters’ in the entorhinal cortex. An apparent change in the pattern of doublecortin labeling also suggests changes in neuronal precursors and undifferentiated neurons.
This study represents the first novel use of a clinically relevant neonatal piglet model to study anesthesia effects on the developing brain. LPS induces neuroinflammation, and this is a potential mechanism for LPS and perhaps isoflurane in causing a change in progenitor cell distribution. We postulate that the isoflurane-induced change in glial progenitor cell distribution could have important implications for cell differentiation, maturation and neural circuit behavior in the rapidly developing brain.
KeywordsPiglets Neurotoxicity Anesthesia Neuroinflammation Neurocognitive outcome Neurodevelopment Isoflurane Hippocampus
Each year, millions of children receive general anesthesia around the world. Isoflurane, a GABA type A (GABAA) receptor agonist, is an inhaled anesthetic commonly used in clinical pediatric anesthesia practice. Anesthesia is traditionally assumed to be safe as long as severe hypotension and hypoxia are avoided. Interfering with the balance of excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters in the developing brain may induce neuroinflammation and alter the formation of normal synaptic connection and dendritic arborisation. These changes could potentially lead to excessive loss of cells at critical times during brain development, and subsequently cause significant cognitive dysfunction. Recent reports of neurotoxicity-induced with isoflurane and other anesthetic agents in pediatric patients have triggered significant concerns about their safety, particularly in infants and young children .
Contemporary pediatric anesthesia is confronted with an urgent need to elucidate the potential neurotoxic effects of commonly used anesthetics on the brain in development. A recent Letter to the Editor published in The New England Journal of Medicine has generated significant concerns about anesthesia-induced neurotoxicity in children and reinforced the urgent need to identify the true meaning of these allegations .
It has become imperative for the pediatric anesthesia community to find proper anesthesia regimens in order to ensure safe anesthesia care for infants and children undergoing necessary surgical procedures and general anesthesia.
Rationale for the piglet model
The need for a readily available, reproducible and translational animal model that is as closely applicable to human neonates as possible, allowing studies of the effect of anesthesia on the brain in development, is mandatory. Rodent and non-human primate models, used in most prior studies, are not ideal animal models to investigate anesthesia neuroinflammation/neurotoxicity for a number of reasons. Rodents are excellent models to investigate neuropathological mechanisms , but translating findings to humans is always a considerable challenge. While non-human primates may be excellent for the study of anesthesia-induced neurotoxicity, only a few pediatric anesthesia toxicity studies have been done in this model [4, 5]. Further, the use of non-human primates has several limitations that impede its broad implementation, such as cost and difficulty of handling.
In recent years, the piglet has emerged as a well-recognized alternative to larger animal models for neuroscience research. They have been used to study myriad pediatric diseases, including neuroinflammatory conditions (infection, stroke, traumatic brain injury, epilepsy) [6–9]. This is, perhaps, a result of the level of homology between human and porcine central nervous systems. Interspecies similitude begins with embryologic development. The timeline of neurodevelopment, though shorter than that of a human, is strikingly analogous to human brain development. There are parallels in neural tube closure, reelin expression, sex-specific development, gliogenesis, and neurotransmitter makeup [10–13].
Post-natally, there are numerous striking neuroanatomical and neurophysiological similarities when one compares the human brain with the piglet brain. Piglets share more CNS similarities with humans than any other mammal. For instance, humans and pigs are the only known mammalian species with a brain “growth spurt” that traverses the perinatal period, with the period of rapid development extending from the prenatal to the postnatal period . Additionally, there are many gross anatomical features shared between pigs and humans, including character and distribution of brain gyri, gray matter, and white matter [15, 16].
The relevance of an animal model must be understood in the context of human pathology, particularly in relation to the brain maturity and pathobiology of the human infant. In the case of non-human primates, very few genes for neurotransmitter receptors have been cloned, meaning that crucial receptor-ligand affinities, allosteric modulators, post-translational modifications, alternative splicing variants, and receptor subunit compositions, all relevant to anesthetic-mediated neural injury, are unknown for this species.
On the other hand, porcine GABAA and NMDA receptors have been cloned . In contrast to newborn rodents, the percentage of adult brain weight at birth in piglets is much closer to that of humans . The brain of the pig more closely resembles the human cerebrum as it is gyrencephalic whereas the rodent brain is lissencephalic. Neonatal swine cranial geometries and cortical and basal ganglia topology are similar to human infants. Important similarities between swine and humans have also been demonstrated in the hippocampus, basal ganglia, and brainstem, which will certainly be areas of interest for our study . The pig and human brain are similar in growth patterns.
Brain development in the piglet is more analogous to that of full-term gestation human newborns than to non-human primates with prenatal brain growth spurts, or rodents with postnatal growth spurts . The multilayer cortical sub-plate of the developing pig brain and the expression pattern of reelin, a glycoprotein that influences neuronal migration, are strongly analogous to the developing human brain [10, 19]. Grey and white matter distributions and patterns are similar in human neonates and piglets, and the maturation of the postnatal pig brain is comparable to humans with respect to myelination and electrical activity [18, 20]. Another important consideration is the time difference in brain development between piglets and human infants. Ten to 14-day old piglets show the rapid brain growth, neuronal maturation, and dendritic arborisations/connections comparable to a 2-month-old human infant . Perhaps most importantly, an impressive homology exists between the genomes of humans and pigs, with many genes being conserved across both species .
There is a clear indication for a more suitable pre-clinical model to study anesthesia-induced neurotoxicity in the neonatal brain. Anesthesia-induced change in brain cell architecture provides proof-of-concept evidence for the suitability of the piglet model in neurotoxicity studies.
The need for a “positive control” for this study was evident, as little is known about the appearance or manifestation of neuroinflammation in the pig. As inflammation is one potential mechanism underlying toxicity seen with anesthetics, the LPS group was used to test whether an acute inflammatory response can induce significant changes in cytoarchitecture of the piglet brain and represent a benchmark for comparison for animals receiving isoflurane.
LPS are found in the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria. These molecules are known to be strong immunogens in animals, and are capable of inducing a robust inflammatory response. The LPS used in this experiment is an endotoxin from Escherichia coli O127:B8 (Sigma-Aldritch, St. Louis, Missouri, USA), which has been used successfully to induce inflammation . The systemic acute phase response in piglets is manifested by fever, lethargy, tachypnea, and diarrhea. It is clear that peripheral inflammatory stimuli lead to neuroinflammation, as evidenced by microglial activation and elevation in CNS cytokines .
Animals and animal handling
Healthy, domestic piglets (Sus scrofa) were used. Animals were 10–14 days old and 2–4 kg depending on the farrowing dates of sows and were obtained from a farm approved by The Ohio State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). All animal experimentations were performed in accordance with IACUC policy. Animals arrived in the vivarium 24 h before experimentation to allow them to acclimate to the environment. They were kept in temperature-controlled cages and given a commercial piglet milk replacer (Liqui-Wean, Milk Specialties, Eden Prairie, MN, USA) ad libitum. Routine animal care was provided by trained veterinary technicians and supervised by licensed veterinarians. The animals were randomly divided into three study groups: (1) control (no intervention, n = 10); (2) lipopolysaccharide (LPS; positive inflammatory control, n = 9); or (3) isoflurane anesthesia (n = 10).
Inflammatory control animals
LPS was administered intraperitoneally at a dose of 100 mcg/kg. Once the LPS was administered, cutaneous temperature was continuously monitored using a liquid crystal strip thermometer affixed to the skin. Following administration of the LPS, animals were observed at least once an hour for the first 6 h by experienced staff. It is also important to provide an area that allows the piglet to remove itself from the range of the warming lamp. The most common manifestations of LPS administration in piglets were elevated body temperature (up to 105 °C), tachypnea, and anorexia, though vomiting and diarrhea can also be seen. No narcotics or anti-inflammatory medications were given. After receiving LPS, the piglets were allowed to convalesce for 48 h, after which piglets were anesthetized and tissue collected in the same manner as above-mentioned.
A primary goal of this study was to develop a standardized approach to anesthetic administration in a complex animal model, with the aim of eliminating the confounding effects of hypoxia, hypercarbia, electrolyte abnormality, or other physiologic perturbation. A classic clinical anesthesia workstation (Integra SL Anesthesia Workstation, DRE Medical Equipment, Louisville, KY, USA) equipped with a pediatric ventilator and monitoring devices used to perform anesthesia in humans was considered critical in this study. Prior studies have used anesthetic chambers to induce anesthesia, with little or no monitoring equipment. This could lead to unrecognized physiological instability that could confound results. Care was taken to ensure rigorous attention to maintaining perioperative conditions identical to human anesthesia. After the 24 h acclimation period, piglets were anesthetized with 8 % sevoflurane in 100 % O2 via face cone mask (Fig. 1). This reproduces the technique used to induce anesthesia in infants and children. In addition, the use of sevoflurane leads to a faster induction of anesthesia in animals and a lower risk of laryngospasm.
Pulse oximetry, non-invasive blood pressure, and electrocardiography were continuously monitored during the induction period and at all times during the study procedure. After induction, sevoflurane was discontinued and isoflurane was titrated to a concentration that allows adequate depth of anesthesia permitting sustained spontaneous respiration (≈2–3 % end tidal concentration). Isoflurane was used for maintenance anesthesia because it is still largely used worldwide due to its favorable safety profile and low cost. A 24-gauge peripheral intravenous catheter was placed in the marginal ear vein to infuse 5 % dextrose in Ringer’s lactate at maintenance rate, i.e., 4 times the piglet’s weight in mL/h, and to administer cefazolin, 25 mg/kg, pre-incision to prevent surgical site infection.
Normal arterial blood gases and serum electrolytes in piglets
Acidosis/alkalosis is usually respiratory; correct with ventilator settings
Hyper/hypocarbia usually due to ventilator support, correct with ventilator settings
200–220 (50 % FiO2)
Hyperoxia should be avoided due to possibility of oxygen free radicals. Hypoxia may be corrected by increasing pressure support or positive and expiratory pressure, or temporarily increasing FiO2
Perturbations are typically respiratory in nature. Correct ventilator settings accordingly
Increase or decrease isotonic fluid infusion rate
Hyper/hypokalemia are rarely seen intraoperatively, mild perturbations do not need correction
Ionized calcium (mmol/L)
For hypocalcemia, consider calcium gluconate 30 mg/kg/dose titrated to laboratory parameters
Increase or decrease dextrose containing, isotonic fluid infusion rate
In the absence of acute blood loss during surgery, anemia is usually due to a dilutional effect from intravenous fluid administration. No therapy is required
Normal ranges for vital signs in neonatal piglets
Suggested treatment of abnormalities
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)
Intraoperative hypotension should be treated with an isotonic fluid bolus, 10–20 mL/kg titrated to effect. Hypertension likely represents inadequate depth of anesthesia, and anesthetic can be deepened with buprenorphine or other narcotic without confounding experimental results
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)
Heart rate (beats per minute)
Bradycardia is rare in the absence of hypoxia. Tachycardia likely represents inadequate depth of anesthesia, and anesthetic can be deepened with buprenorphine or other narcotic without confounding experimental results
Oxygen saturation (%)
Most piglets will require pressure support if respiration is spontaneous under anesthesia. Increasing pressure support or positive-end expiratory pressure often corrects hypoxia in anesthetized piglets
Respiratory rate (breaths per minute )
Postoperatively, piglets with tachypnea often need additional pain medication. In LPS-treated piglets, tachypnea is commonly seen with the acute phase response and requires no treatment
End-tidal carbon dioxide (mmHg)
Titrate ventilator support as indicated
Core tempature (°C)
Hypothermia can be avoided by housing piglets in temperature-controlled cages and by maintaining active warming during surgery. Hyperthermia may be sign of malignant hyperthermia and should be taken seriously. Fever is common in LPS treated animals, and requires no treatment
At the conclusion of surgery, the femoral artery catheter was removed and the wound was infiltrated with 0.25 % bupivacaine, 1 mL/kg of with 1:200,000 epinephrine to control pain and to simulate human management. Anesthesia was discontinued and the piglet allowed to awaken, at which time the trachea was extubated. Buprenorphine 0.05 mg/kg was administered subcutaneously every 3 h as needed to ensure adequate pain control. When appropriate, the piglet was returned to its home cage, actively warmed with a warming light.
Animals recovered for 48 h. During this time, they were monitored every hour for the first 6 h after surgery and every 4 h thereafter. Monitoring includes general observation, temperature, inspection of the operative site, and measurement of respiratory rate. If the animal was awake and behaving normally, vital signs such as blood pressure were not measured due to the difficulty of obtaining non-invasive blood pressure on awake piglets.
Immunohistochemistry and quantification of doublecortin-positive cells
Fixed brains were sectioned and mounted using an identical method to that described above. Tissue was stained using anti-doublecortin antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) and counterstained with hematoxylin and eosin.
Demographic and parametric data are reported as mean ± SD. Analyses between groups were performed using an ANOVA and post hoc test for multiple comparisons. A Dunnett’s test was used to compare data with the control group whereas a Student–Newman–Keuls was used for between group comparisons. To ensure normal distribution and parametric nature of the data, the number of animals studied was determined by calculation of statistical power for a Type I and II errors of 0.05 and 0.8, respectively. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Demographic characteristics of experimental groups
Average age (days, ±SD)
Average weight (kg, ±SD)
Control (n = 10)
11.7 ± 3.06
3.05 ± 0.83
Isoflurane (n = 10)
11.6 ± 2.14
3.56 ± 0.83
LPS (n = 8)
11.6 ± 3.02
3.50 ± 0.76
Identification of small, nucleated cells
Quantification of total PGCs in entorhinal cortex
Quantification of PGCs in clusters
Basal ganglia ischemic infarct in an isoflurane-treated piglet
This study represents the first novel use of a clinically relevant neonatal piglet model for the study of anesthesia effects on the developing brain. It reports, for the first time, changes in progenitor glial cell distribution in response to exposure to isoflurane anesthesia. We found that exposure to a clinically relevant administration of isoflurane, an inhalational anesthetic agent, induces a measurable increase in clustering of progenitor glial cells in an area of the brain that is critical for learning and memory. In addition, we report the concerning finding of an ischemic stroke in the basal ganglia of one animal exposed to isoflurane.
An important finding is that both isoflurane and LPS induction resulted in a significant increase in progenitor cells forming ‘clusters’ in the entorhinal cortex. These progenitor cells can differentiate into microglial cells, oligodendrocytes, astrocytes or neurons . Therefore, a change in progenitor cell distribution implicates all these types of cells. LPS is known to induce neuroinflammation, activation of microglia and elevation of CNS cytokines [20, 21]. Therefore, one possible scenario is that isoflurane, like LPS, can induce changes in progenitor cell distribution in the piglet by activating a neuroinflammatory mechanism. Changes in the pattern of distribution of cells in the piglet brain may also involve neuronal precursors and undifferentiated neurons, identified by their doublecortin immunoreactivity. As noted earlier, 10 to 14 day old piglets show the rapid brain growth, neuronal maturation, and dendritic arborisations/connections that are comparable to a 2 month old human infant . At this critical stage of rapid brain development, the observed alterations in the cellular organizational matrix of the entorhinal cortex strongly suggest that isoflurane (and LPS) are having a significant effect on the brain. Taken together, we postulate that the isoflurane-induced change in glial progenitor cell distribution could have important implications for cell differentiation, maturation and neural circuit behavior, as well as learning/memory in the rapidly developing brain. These novel questions can now be tested in a clinically relevant model.
Although the presence of progenitor glial cells in animals of this age is consistent with what is known about neurodevelopment in other, similar species, as well as humans, the changes in glial cell distribution is likely to be of importance. The consequence of alteration of the normal growth and distribution patterns of these cells is highly relevant to the question of anesthetic neurotoxicity. Though the neurocognitive effect of disrupting the PGC population is poorly understood, information gleaned from other models of disease underscore the importance of further investigating this finding. For example, the loss of glial cytoarchitecture in the gut has been shown to induce enterocolitis in mouse models of inflammatory bowel disease .
The entorhinal cortex was selected as an area of focus due to its importance in learning, spatial memory, and declarative memory. The entorhinal cortex serves as a communication hub between the cortex and the hippocampus, forming vital connections that allow for memory formation and processing. It receives afferent input from the sensory cortex, which in turn projects to the dentate gyrus, hippocampus, subiculum, and fimbria, successively. Thus, the entorhinal cortex is the “gateway” to the hippocampus.
Damage to this area could have significant and long-lasting effects on short- and long-term memory as evidenced by its critical role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. The implications of damage to this area of the brain are best underscored by the case of H.M., a patient who underwent medial temporal lobe resection for epilepsy in 1953. He lost virtually all of his entorhinal cortex, and as a result he suffered severe anterograde amnesia whereas his working and procedural memories remained intact .
The finding of an acute neuronal infarct in one piglet is extremely concerning, especially if it becomes a consistent finding in other piglets exposed to isoflurane anesthesia. Given the fact that brain infarcts in children are often “subclinical” and found incidentally when cerebral imaging is performed later for another reason, it will also be critical to identify the frequency of this occurrence. Kim et al. reported that 21 % of children had abnormalities, some of which were described as “unspecified white matter abnormality of unclear etiology” . So-called “silent” strokes are shockingly common in children with sickle cell disease [28, 29]. It is not impossible that anesthetics, particularly when administered repetitively, may be causing areas of ischemic infarction that are never detected because they do not cause typical stigmata of stroke, such as weakness, facial droop, dysarthria, or gait disturbance. We are concerned that if subclinical infarcts are occurring during anesthesia, they may be partially responsible for the neurocognitive deficits that have been reported in children after multiple anesthetics . It is vital to learn whether this is a common effect of anesthesia in animals with complex (gyrencephalic) brains in order to make anesthesia safer for infants and children.
We can now safely and effectively use this model to systematically test a number of different conditions and clinically used anesthesia regimens. This model represents the most clinically relevant animal model for neuroinflammation/neurotoxicity investigations. It reproduces with high fidelity the clinical scenario with respect to intubation, surgery, anesthesia, monitoring, and recovery infants and young children experience in the operating room and postoperatively, and its standardized approach carefully controls all physiologic variables that could confound results.
Although piglets are recognized as an ideal model for human infant neuroscience research due to their similarity in size, brain development, physiology, and pathophysiologic responses, our proof-of-concept study indicates that the piglet is a suitable model for anesthetic neurotoxicity screening [31, 32]. We strongly believe it is a remarkably well-adapted animal model, which is a major step toward understanding the potential for anesthesia-induced brain complications.
The neonatal piglet represents a unique animal model to accurately investigate neurological anesthesia-related potential consequences considering its unparalleled similarities to the neonatal human brain. This clinically relevant, neurodevelopmental, neuroanatomical, and neurophysiological mammalian model provides striking similarities to human neonates. It is an accurate, highly reproducible, cost-effective, and appropriate to test a broad range of anesthetic regimens that are commonly used in contemporary pediatric anesthesia practice. One goal was to reliably induce neurotoxicity in the “inflammatory control animals” in a manner that will create a profile of neurocellular reactions that will be the benchmark for all future experimental investigations. Studies are underway to explore cell activation (i.e. microglial, astrocyte, neural), as well as global gene-expression profiles comparing control, LPS and isoflurane treatment groups to obtain a read out of the types of genes, including pro-inflammatory genes, channels, and pathways that may be sensitive to treatment.
The present study reports the effect of 3 h isoflurane anesthesia on progenitor glial cells of the entorhinal cortex, and provides a novel mechanism for investigation of the potential unwanted effects of prolonged anesthesia in the neonate piglet, that may potentially have similarities and implications for infant children receiving anesthesia. In previous studies, a connection was made between apoptosis and caspase-3 activation as a mechanism to explain anesthesia-induced neurotoxicity [5, 33, 34]. The latter mechanism remains to be tested in our model.
Further investigations will be needed to study later time points after anesthesia, multiple anesthetic regimens and their consequences on the brain in development. It is hoped that the resultant data will provide new insights into the extent to which anesthesia can induce neurotoxicity that would impact directly upon the safe practice of pediatric anesthesia. If so, scientific findings from this model could help identify the safest anesthetic regimens for infants and young children. It could also guide future neurological therapeutic interventions based on the identification of the mechanisms of action and molecular targets with the potential to ameliorate any anesthetic-induced neural injury.
To avoid hypoxic/ischemic insults to the brain, a clinical anesthesia machine is used to ensure maintenance of adequate ventilation, oxygenation, and cardiac output until perfusion of cold PBS begins.
EW helped design the study, conduct the study, analyze the data, and write the manuscript. BB helped design the study, analyze the data, and write the manuscript. ADM helped analyze the data and write the manuscript. TLK helped conduct the study and write the manuscript. JDT helped analyze the data and write the manuscript. CRP helped analyze the data and write the manuscript. FLC helped design the study, conduct the study, and write the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors wish to acknowledge the contribution of Dr. Dondrae Coble and Lori Mattox of the Ohio State University Laboratory Animal Resources Center. Their assistance in the development of this model has been invaluable.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- Hays SR, Deshpande JK (2011) Newly postulated neurodevelopmental risks of pediatric anesthesia. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 11(2):205–210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-010-0177-4 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rappaport BA, Suresh S, Hertz S, Evers AS, Orser BA (2015) Anesthetic neurotoxicity—clinical implications of animal models. N Engl J Med 372(9):796–797. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1414786 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nestler EJ, Hyman SE (2010) Animal models of neuropsychiatric disorders. Nat Neurosci 13(10):1161–1169. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2647 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zou X, Liu F, Zhang X, Patterson TA, Callicott R, Liu S et al (2011) Inhalation anesthetic-induced neuronal damage in the developing rhesus monkey. Neurotoxicol Teratol 33(5):592–597. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ntt.2011.06.003 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brambrink AM, Evers AS, Avidan MS, Farber NB, Smith DJ, Zhang X et al (2010) Isoflurane-induced neuroapoptosis in the neonatal rhesus macaque brain. Anesthesiology 112(4):834–841. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181d049cd PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Elmore MR, Burton MD, Conrad MS, Rytych JL, Van Alstine WG, Johnson RW (2014) Respiratory viral infection in neonatal piglets causes marked microglia activation in the hippocampus and deficits in spatial learning. J Neurosci 6:2120–2129Google Scholar
- Alonso-Alconada D, Broad KD, Bainbridge A, Chandrasekaran M, Faulkner SD, Kerenyi A et al (2015) Brain cell death is reduced with cooling by 3.5 degrees C to 5 degrees C but increased with cooling by 8.5 degrees C in a piglet asphyxia model. Stroke 46(1):275–278. doi:https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.114.007330 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Costine BA, Missios S, Taylor SR, McGuone D, Smith CM, Dodge CP et al (2015) The subventricular zone in the immature piglet brain: anatomy and exodus of neuroblasts into white matter after traumatic brain injury. Dev Neurosci 2:115–130Google Scholar
- Holtzman D, Mulkern R, Meyers R, Cook C, Allred E, Khait I et al (1998) In vivo phosphocreatine and ATP in piglet cerebral gray and white matter during seizures. Brain Res 783(1):19–27PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nielsen KB, Sondergaard A, Johansen MG, Schauser K, Vejlsted M, Nielsen AL et al (2010) Reelin expression during embryonic development of the pig brain. BMC Neurosci 11:75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-11-75 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jelsing J, Nielsen R, Olsen AK, Grand N, Hemmingsen R, Pakkenberg B (2006) The postnatal development of neocortical neurons and glial cells in the Gottingen minipig and the domestic pig brain. J Exp Biol 8:1454–1462Google Scholar
- Niblock MM, Luce CJ, Belliveau RA, Paterson DS, Kelly ML, Sleeper LA et al (2005) Comparative anatomical assessment of the piglet as a model for the developing human medullary serotonergic system. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 1:169–183Google Scholar
- van Straaten HW, Peeters MC, Hekking JW, van der Lende T (2000) Neurulation in the pig embryo. Anat Embryol 202(2):75–84PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dobbing J, Sands J (1979) Comparative aspects of the brain growth spurt. Early Human Dev 3(1):79–83View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thibault KL, Margulies SS (1998) Age-dependent material properties of the porcine cerebrum: effect on pediatric inertial head injury criteria. J Biomech 12:1119–1126Google Scholar
- Dickerson JW, Dobbing J (1005) Prenatal and postnatal growth and development of the central nervous system of the pig. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1967(166):384–395Google Scholar
- Stephenson FA (2006) Structure and trafficking of NMDA and GABAA receptors. Biochem Soc Trans 34(Pt 5):877–881. doi:https://doi.org/10.1042/bst0340877 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Glauser EM (1966) Advantages of piglets as experimental animals in pediatric research. Exp Med Surg 24(2):181–190PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Montiel JF, Wang WZ, Oeschger FM, Hoerder-Suabedissen A, Tung WL, Garcia-Moreno F et al (2011) Hypothesis on the dual origin of the Mammalian subplate. Front Neuroanat 5:25. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2011.00025 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lind NM, Moustgaard A, Jelsing J, Vajta G, Cumming P, Hansen AK (2007) The use of pigs in neuroscience: modeling brain disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 31(5):728–751. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.02.003 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goureau A, Garrigues A, Tosser-Klopp G, Lahbib-Mansais Y, Chardon P, Yerle M (2001) Conserved synteny and gene order difference between human chromosome 12 and pig chromosome 5. Cytogenet Cell Genet 94(1–2):49–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000048782
- Kang P, Zhang L, Hou Y, Ding B, Yi D, Wang L et al (2014) Effects of l-proline on the growth performance, and blood parameters in Weaned Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-challenged pigs. Asian Australas J Anim Sci 27(8):1150–1156. doi:https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13828 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Henry CJ, Huang Y, Wynne AM, Godbout JP (2009) Peripheral lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge promotes microglial hyperactivity in aged mice that is associated with exaggerated induction of both pro-inflammatory IL-1beta and anti-inflammatory IL-10 cytokines. Brain Behav Immun 23(3):309–317. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2008.09.002 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dimou L, Gotz M (2014) Glial cells as progenitors and stem cells: new roles in the healthy and diseased brain. Physiol Rev 94(3):709–737. doi:https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00036.2013 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cornet A, Savidge TC, Cabarrocas J, Deng WL, Colombel JF, Lassmann H et al (2001) Enterocolitis induced by autoimmune targeting of enteric glial cells: a possible mechanism in Crohn’s disease? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(23):13306–13311. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.231474098 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Augustinack JC, van der Kouwe AJ, Salat DH, Benner T, Stevens AA, Annese J et al (2014) H.M’.s contributions to neuroscience: a review and autopsy studies. Hippocampus 24(11):1267–1286. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22354 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim BS, Illes J, Kaplan RT, Reiss A, Atlas SW (2002) Incidental findings on pediatric MR images of the brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23(10):1674–1677PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jordan LC, McKinstry RC, Kraut MA, Ball WS, Vendt BA, Casella JF et al (2010) Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging of children with sickle cell disease. Pediatrics 1:53–61Google Scholar
- Kwiatkowski JL, Zimmerman RA, Pollock AN, Seto W, Smith-Whitley K, Shults J et al (2009) Silent infarcts in young children with sickle cell disease. Br J Haematol 3:300–305Google Scholar
- Wilder RT, Flick RP, Sprung J, Katusic SK, Barbaresi WJ, Mickelson C et al (2009) Early exposure to anesthesia and learning disabilities in a population-based birth cohort. Anesthesiology 110(4):796–804. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.anes.0000344728.34332.5d PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lunney JK (2007) Advances in swine biomedical model genomics. Int J Biol Sci 3(3):179–184PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nemzek JA, Hugunin KM, Opp MR (2008) Modeling sepsis in the laboratory: merging sound science with animal well-being. Comp Med 58(2):120–128PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hyman BT, Yuan J. Apoptotic and non-apoptotic roles of caspases in neuronal physiology and pathophysiology. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13(6):395–406. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3228.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stevens MF, Werdehausen R, Gaza N, Hermanns H, Kremer D, Bauer I, et al. Midazolam activates the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis independent of benzodiazepine and death receptor signaling. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011;36(4):343–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0b013e318217a6c7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar