Skip to main content

Re: Choices have consequences: the nexus between DNA repair pathways and genomic instability in cancer

To the Editor,

Despite a broad DNA repair title implicating defective repair with genomic stability and cancer, this paper focuses largely on repair of DNA double strand breaks (DNA DSBs) by one of the two main mechanisms for their resolution—homologous recombination (HR). It is important for those not in the field to be aware of the many other DNA lesion types associated with cancer, including pyrimidine dimers induced by ultraviolet radiation and oxidative nucleotide damage induced as biproducts of cellular metabolism as well as exogenous DNA damaging agents. Likewise, canonical DNA repair pathways and subpathways, apart from HR, are associated with cancer predisposition. These include defective nucleotide excision repair in xeroderma pigmentosum (massive increase in skin cancer risk) [1] and mismatch repair in hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer [2]. These associations have been extensively reviewed [3]. Base excision repair may also have a role in cancer avoidance via epigenetic protection of CpG [4] islands and is a major therapeutic target in specific cancer types [5].

The Future Perspectives summary paragraph also states that DSBs are caused by chemotherapy. While this is true for the minority of chemotherapeutic agents, it is characteristic of ionizing radiation, used as radiotherapy in around one half of all cancer patients in the Western World [6]. It is important to note that modulation of DNA DSB repair in cancer may have very significant implications for this form of cancer therapy.


  1. Marteijn JA, Lans H, Vermeulen W, Hoeijmakers JH (2014) Understanding nucleotide excision repair and its roles in cancer and ageing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 15(7):465–481

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gelsomino F, Barbolini M, Spallanzani A, Pugliese G, Cascinu S (2016) The evolving role of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer: a review. Cancer Treat Rev 51:19–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoeijmakers JH (2001) Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer. Nature 411(6835):366–374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bellacosa A, Drohat AC (2015) Role of base excision repair in maintaining the genetic and epigenetic integrity of CpG sites. DNA Repair (Amst) 32:33–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gadducci A, Guerrieri ME (2016) PARP inhibitors in epithelial ovarian cancer: state of art and perspectives of clinical research. Anticancer Res 36(5):2055–2064

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Accessed 3 Feb 2017

Download references



Competing interests

The author declare that he has no competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael McKay.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McKay, M. Re: Choices have consequences: the nexus between DNA repair pathways and genomic instability in cancer
. Clin Trans Med 6, 8 (2017).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: