Skip to main content

Table 2 Univariate analysis for progression free survival in our cohort

From: EGFR T790M relative mutation purity predicts osimertinib treatment efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer patients

Characteristics

Univariate analyses

HR (95% CI)

P value

Age at start of osimertinib, years

  < 60

1.00 (Reference)

 

  ≥ 60

0.75 (0.38–1.51)

0.425

Sex

 Female

1.00 (Reference)

 

 Male

1.24 (0.62–2.47)

0.548

Smoker

 Never

1.00 (Reference)

 

 Ever

1.40 (0.64–3.07)

0.401

 Unknown

1.51 (0.19–11.80)

0.692

Brain metastases

 Yes

1.00 (Reference)

 

 None

0.72 (0.36–1.43)

0.345

Line of therapy 

 1st/2nda

1.00 (Reference)

 

 3rd or more

1.05 (0.49–2.24)

0.900

NGS platform

 BGIb

1.00 (Reference)

 

 OrigiMed

1.19 (0.61–2.34)

0.612

EGFR activating mutation

 Exon 19 deletion

1.00 (Reference)

 

 Exon 21 L858R

1.21 (0.57–2.56)

0.618

MSAF

 Lower than the median MSAF

1.00 (Reference)

 

 Higher than the median MSAF

0.73 (0.37–1.45)

0.373

TP53 status

 Mutated

1.00 (Reference)

 

 Wild type

0.53 (0.25–1.11)

0.092

 T790M RMA (continuous)

0.40 (0.14–1.16)

0.091

 T790M RMP (continuous)

0.14 (0.04–0.56)

0.005

T790M RMA (categorical)

 ≤ 0.30

1.00 (Reference)

 

 > 0.30

0.43 (0.22–0.85)

0.015

T790M RMP (categorical)

 ≤ 0.24

1.00 (Reference)

 

  > 0.24

0.36 (0.18–0.72)

0.004

  1. HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, NGS next-generation sequencing, EGFR epidermal growth factor receptor, MSAF maximum somatic allele frequency, RMA Relative mutation abundance, RMP Relative mutation purity
  2. aThree patients had de novo T790M mutation and osimertinib were the first-line therapy
  3. bTwo samples analyzed with an upgrading BGI OseqT NGS panel