Skip to main content

Table 4 Maspin expression in lung cancer

From: Role of maspin in cancer

Authors

Years

N. patients

Maspin expression

Clinical features/prognosis/predictive factors

Bircan et al.

2010

28 (squamous cell lung cancer)

89.3% positive maspin

 
  

18 (lung adenocarcinoma)

77.8% positive maspin

 
  

17 (small cell lung cancer)

52.9% positive maspin

 

Lonardo et al.

2005

46 (squamous cell lung cancer)

100% positive maspin

Positive maspin = almost exclusively nuclear position

  

77 (lung adenocarcinoma)

93,5% positive maspin

Positive nuclear maspin in squamous cell lung cancer = low grade, low proliferative rate, absence of invasion, negative p53 vs nuclear-cytoplasmic position.

Frey et al. 2009

2009

80 (lung adenocarcinoma)

93.7% positive maspin

 
   

62.6% positive nucleus

Positive nuclear maspin = 36.6% proliferative rate, Stage I OS: 87.7 ± 6.9 months, 42.5% moderate and poor differantation, 25,5% p53+, 4.2% high VEGF

   

37.3% positive cytoplasm - nucleus

Positive cytoplasmic maspin = 56.9%proliferative rate, Stage I OS: 58.7 ± 6.5 months, 71.4% moderate and poor differantation,53.5% p53+, 39.2% high VEGF

Woenckhaus et al.

2007

487 (tissue microarrays)

72.3% positive maspin

 
   

65.3% positive nucleus

Positive nuclear maspin = 63.9% squamous cancer, 16.9%

   

37.8% positive cytoplasm

Positive cytoplasmic maspin = 78.2% squamous cancer, 6.8% adenocarcinoma adenocarcinoma

Hirai et al.

2005

112 (non-small cell lung cancer)

55.3%positive maspin

Positive maspin = 77.8% positive cytoplasm Stage III and 36.2% positive cytoplasm Stage I

   

44.7% negative maspin

 

Berardi et al.

2010

439 (non-small cell lung cancer)

85.6% positive maspin

Positive maspin = longer OS

   

22.8% positive nucleus

Positive nuclear maspin = independent prognostic factor

   

44% positive cytoplasm

Positive cytoplasmic maspin = especially smokers, lower OS than nuclear position

   

14.4% negative maspin

Negative maspin = Lower OS

Wu et al.

2012

160 (non-small cell lung cancer)

48.1% positive maspin

Positive maspin = lower vasculogenic mimicry and microvessel density, longer OS, low Stage, low grade, low lymphnode metastasis

   

51.9% negative maspin

Negative maspin = higher vasculogenic mimicry and microvessel density, lower OS, high Stage, high grade, lymphnode metastasis

  

20 (normal tissue)

100% positive maspin

 

Nakagawa et al.

2006

210(non-small cell lung cancer)

73.7% positive maspin in squamous cancer

Positive maspin = 70.1% 5-years OS

   

26.3%negative maspin in squamous cancer

Negative maspin = 41.5% 5-years OS

Katakura et al.

2006

55 (non-small cell lung cancer)

Not found

Positive maspin = 67.7% 5-years OS

    

Negative maspin = 41.4% 5-years OS

Takanami et al.

2008

181 (non-small cell lung cancer)

40.8%positive maspin

 
   

65.7% positive maspin in squamous cancer

Positive maspin in squamous cell lung cancer = 52.2% 5-years OS

   

34.3%negative maspin in squamous cancer

Negative maspin in squamous cell lung cancer = 24% OS 5 years OS

   

22.8% positive maspin in adenocarcinoma

 
   

59.2% negative maspin