Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristic of the participants

From: Embryos derived from donor or patient oocytes are not different for in vitro fertilization outcomes when PGT allows euploid embryo selection: a retrospective study

 

Age groups, own oocytes

Donor oocytes

Age category

≤ 29a

30–34b

35–37c

38–40d

41–43e

≥ 44f

Donor age: 18–32g

BMI: 23.6 ± 

Size (n)

45

112

144

206

167

60

236

Recipient age (years)h

26.4 ± 2.7b,c,d,e,f,g

32.4 ± 1.3a,c,d,e,f,g

36.1 ± 0.7a,b,d,e,f,g

39.0 ± 0.8a,b,c,e,f,g

41.8 ± 0.8a,b,c,d,f,g

45.1 ± 1.6a,b,c,d,e,g

42.0 ± 4.6a,b,c,d,f

Recipient BMI (kg/m2)

23.6 ± 3.5

25.0 ± 4.1

24.7 ± 4.0

24.4 ± 3.6

24.8 ± 4.0

25.2 ± 3.5

25.3 ± 3.9

Oocyte collected (n)

18.1 ± 9.1d,e,f

16.7 ± 9.3d,e,f

15.6 ± 8.3d,e,f

11.8 ± 6.4a,b,c,g

11.3 ± 6.9a,b,c,g

8.8 ± 6.6a,b,c,g

15.7 ± 6.4d,e,f

Oocyte fertilized (n)

13.4 ± 6.4d,e,f

12.6 ± 7.9d,e,f

11.5 ± 6.9d,e,f

8.7 ± 5.0a,b,c,g

8.3 ± 5.6a,b,c,g

6.5 ± 4.8a,b,c,g

11.2 ± 5.0d,e,f

Embryos (n)

8.3 ± 6.1d,e,f

8.6 ± 7.3d,e,f,g

7.2 ± 5.7d,e,f

5.4 ± 4.0a,b,c

5.3 ± 4.3a,b,c

4.2 ± 3.6a,b,c,g

6.5 ± 4.3b,f

Fertilization rate (%)

73.2 ± 17.3

69.8 ± 18.3

71.4 ± 19.2

69.5 ± 18.4

68.5 ± 21.9

75.2 ± 22.2

69.0 ± 17.4

Aneuploidy rate (%)

27.5 ± 30.9d,e,f

37.5 ± 30.7d,e,f

37.6 ± 32.5d,e,f

56.9 ± 35.4a,b,c,e,f,g

67.9 ± 36.5a,b,c,d,f,g

87.5 ± 24.9a,b,c,d,e,g

27.5 ± 26.9d,e,f

Cycles with no euploid embryos (%)

1.8e,f

4.6e,f

7.3d,e,f

26.9b,c,e,f,g

34.7a,b,c,d,f,g

20.1a,b,c,d,e,g

4.6d,e,f

  1. Values are mean ± standard error. Significance was determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Bonferroni or Dunnett’s T3 post hoc test
  2. BMI Body-mass index
  3. aSignificant difference vs. ≤ 29 group, p < 0.05 (two-tailed)
  4. bSignificant difference vs. 30–34 group, p < 0.05 (two-tailed)
  5. cSignificant difference vs. 35–37 group, p < 0.05 (two-tailed)
  6. dSignificant difference vs. 38–40 group, p < 0.05 (two-tailed)
  7. eSignificant difference vs. 41–43 group, p<0.05 (two-tailed)
  8. fSignificant difference vs. ≥44 group, p<0.05 (two-tailed)
  9. gSignificant difference vs. donor group, p<0.05 (two-tailed)
  10. hThree patients did not indicate their age